At Cannes, Digitas North America CEO Amy Lanzi argues that advertising’s AI boom resembles the overhyped promises of programmatic, with platforms selling automation while agencies and brands still need human judgment, strategy, and data fluency. The conversation also traces the rise of creators as full-fledged marketing businesses and the growing fight over who controls the relationship between brands, audiences, and the platforms in between.

Natalia, Every’s head of consulting, describes how AI agents are moving from novelty to everyday infrastructure: managing sales ops, triaging email, building family care systems, and turning research into personalized learning tools. The conversation also argues for a clearer division of labor, with human judgment and off-the-shelf software still essential even as custom agents absorb administrative work.

Edwin Chen, the founder of data-labeling and evaluation firm Surge, describes training frontier models as a kind of schooling for AGI, where benchmarks now stretch from middle-school math to research-level discovery. The conversation widens into a debate over whether AI should optimize for human flourishing or the same engagement traps that warped social media, and what deeply personal data may be worth in teaching models taste, judgment, and voice.

AWS chief Matt Garman argues that AI will reorder white-collar work rather than erase it, even as Amazon automates more tasks and trims parts of its own workforce. The conversation ranges from college AI degrees and shaky labor data to enterprise adoption, data center backlash, and the question of whether efficiency gains create new jobs fast enough.

At Cloaked, head of product Kyler describes how an internal AI “harness” evolved from a personal fix for prompt-copying drudgery into companywide infrastructure installed on every managed computer. The conversation traces a distinctly AI-native operating model, with Slack agents for nontechnical staff, coding agents for power users, and layered guardrails designed to make automation useful without making it reckless.

Patreon CEO Jack Conte says the company has outgrown its old role as a payments layer and is rebuilding itself as a discovery, hosting and community platform for creators squeezed by algorithmic feeds, Apple’s fees and AI-fueled slop. The conversation ranges from social media’s failures to the payment and moderation pressures of running a creator business that now competes more directly with Instagram, TikTok and Substack.

Anthropic engineering leader Fiona Fung describes a software world where code is abundant, initiative matters more than syntax, and managers rely on AI to track quality, feedback, and the work itself. The conversation traces how engineering, product management, and team culture are being remade by agents, even as loneliness, fear, and accountability become harder problems to solve.

A weekend scramble over Anthropic’s newly released Claude Fable 5 became a test case for how the Trump administration may regulate AI: through formal safety policy or through panicked, personalized power. Nilay Patel and Verge reporter Hayden Field trace the model’s abrupt shutdown, the export controls that followed, and the industry’s growing fear that political risk now sits alongside technical risk.

GitHub’s Kyle Daigle describes a software world remade by coding agents, where pull requests and commits are surging, nondevelopers are building apps, and maintainers need new controls to keep pace. The conversation follows the business and product consequences of that shift, from model routing and token costs to the long game of training tools on a developer’s habits and context.

As AI coding tools shift from one-off prompts to self-directed automations, the conversation breaks down loops in plain English: scheduled tasks, hooks and goal-based agents that keep working until a job is done. Working through Claude Code and Codex, it also makes the case for guardrails, isolated workspaces and clear validation before handing autonomous agents the keys.

At Platformer’s first live show, Casey Newton and guests take stock of AI’s contradictory role in the workplace: a source of anxiety, a generator of strange new job titles, and a tool that may make software creation radically more personal. The conversation moves from Atlassian’s enterprise “context graph” to Eugenia Kuyda’s vision of companions and bespoke apps, tracing how automation may reshape both office work and the products people use every day.

Product leader turned creator Peter Yang talks through leaving Roblox for a self-funded solo run, trading calendar-gridlock and corporate ladder ambitions for a builder’s life shaped by AI tools, family time and public experimentation. The conversation traces how he uses agents to automate the drudgery, sharpen his strategy and protect the craft from slipping into slop.

Claire Vo and Braintrust CEO Ankur Goyal make the case that coding agents belong in the hardest engineering work, from query optimization and data migrations to the unglamorous discipline of CI. Their conversation argues that the real leverage comes from rigorous evals: defining success clearly, letting models explore the how, and using systems to extend human judgment rather than replace it.

Skydio chief executive Adam Bry argues that autonomous drones are moving from camera toys to networked infrastructure, with their most consequential uses in emergency response, utility inspection, and military reconnaissance. The conversation turns on whether the United States can build a domestic drone industry at scale while navigating bans on Chinese rivals, the politics of surveillance, and the moral limits of AI in warfare.

A sudden U.S.-ordered shutdown of Anthropic’s Fable 5 has set off a fight over AI safety, export controls and who gets to decide when a jailbreak justifies pulling a frontier model offline. The conversation weighs incompetence against political theater, while warning that if the ban sticks, access to advanced AI could hinge on nationality, ID checks and a far broader crackdown across the industry.

Financial Times writer Sarah O’Connor argues that AI’s effect on work is not an unstoppable natural force but a series of choices shaped by power, policy and the people closest to the job. Drawing on reporting from translators, nurses, software developers and Hollywood writers, she makes the case that the real fight is over human agency and what kinds of work should remain irreducibly human.

Condé Nast CEO Roger Lynch argues that legacy media survives by acting less like a magazine publisher than a portfolio of brands built for events, subscriptions, commerce, video, and adaptation. He talks through the company’s restructuring, the collapse of Google-driven traffic, the uneasy bargains of AI licensing, and why authority matters more than raw scale in the creator era.

Mike Krieger describes how living with Anthropic’s new Fable 5 model reshapes work from prompting to delegation, turning AI from a clever assistant into something closer to a teammate. The conversation follows what that shift means for software engineering, verification, workplace collaboration and the widening gap between a person’s intent and their ability to build.

Brookings fellow Molly Kinder argues that the real danger of AI is not an instant jobs apocalypse but a long, destabilizing period of selective white-collar displacement for which government and industry have no credible plan. The conversation weighs retraining, safety nets, and broader wealth-sharing proposals against a future in which automation chips away at the skills and careers workers once thought were secure.

Product leader Noah Weiner explains why many companies asking for AI help really need a return to first principles first, with the technology serving as a tool rather than a strategy. The conversation follows his “free range” consulting practice through small businesses, private equity turnarounds and startup law, while arguing that AI is compressing discovery, prototyping and decision-making into a far faster operating rhythm.